Rechercher dans ce blog

Monday, January 31, 2022

Sowing Discourse - ARTnews

israelob.blogspot.com

In The Life of Plants: A Metaphysics of Mixture (2017), philosopher Emanuele Coccia points out that biology, ostensibly the scientific study of “life,” tends to be based largely on concepts drawn from the animal kingdom. Plants have received significantly less attention, in both the life sciences and in philosophy, creating a pervasive zoological bias. Unlike animals (which generally stop developing once they reached sexual maturity), some plants grow continuously, spending their entire lives constructing new organs and body parts. Plants are nonmotile, but can spread to cover vast surfaces, from which they absorb resources and interact with other organisms to support their growth. “Plants participate in the world in its totality in everything they meet,” Coccia writes, noting that “one cannot separate the plant—neither physically nor metaphysically—from the world that accommodates it.”

Related Articles

Four female busts made of whyte

Plants have played a fundamental role in shaping Earth’s landscape and climate, most visibly over the past 540 million years, and so can be considered “a geologic force of nature,” as botanist David Beerling has put it. They are estimated to account for about 80 percent of the planet’s total biomass (animals, by contrast, are said to make up less than half of 1 percent). Photosynthesis, a key function of plants, is what enables other life-forms to breathe. Plants take in carbon dioxide to produce oxygen, collectively contributing to an atmosphere that has made—and continues to make—animal life possible at all.

Humans have also been a “geologic force of nature,” particularly during the past few centuries. Since the early 2000s, the term “Anthropocene” has gained traction as the name of our current geological epoch, one characterized by substantial alterations to Earth’s climate and ecosystems due to human activity. Deforestation, mining, industrial agriculture, overfishing, and increasing greenhouse gas emissions are some major factors said to be driving planetary life here toward mass extinction.

Some critics, however, claim there is a racial blindness implicit in the term “Anthropocene.” The current debate over whether to mark the start of this human-driven epoch with the Industrial Revolution of the 1800s (heralded by the invention of the steam engine) or the Great Acceleration of the 1950s effectively ignores what geographer Kathryn Yusoff calls the “shadow geology” created by centuries of colonialism, extraction, and genocide. Is history (yet again) to be understood as a tale of progress forged by the ingenuity of white male entrepreneurs? In A Billion Black Anthropocenes or None (2018), Yusoff argues against the universal notion of “human” that anthropos implies. Such a view denies how the racialization of our species has been part and parcel of a system whereby, Yusoff declares, “imperialism and ongoing (settler) colonialisms have been ending worlds for as long as [these forces] have been in existence.”

As Yusoff has sought to characterize geology as a discipline implicated in coloniality and dehumanization, so a number of contemporary artists has been using plants in their works to explore histories of extracting, classifying, and subjugating bodies, plants, and other kinds of matter. Works by Beatriz Cortez, Candice Lin, Precious Okoyomon, and Kandis Williams speak to the relations between forced labor and landscapes; racial and taxonomic categories; and the forces of capitalism, imperialism, and racism. These artists show how modernity was made possible by agricultural (and other kinds of) labor performed by enslaved and indentured peoples. They reveal a present-day world indelibly shaped by transformative encounters between humans, places, plants, and other natural resources.

Kandis Williams: Nay, but tell me, am I not unlucky indeed, / To arise from the earth and be only a weed?…2020, xerox collage and ink on watercolor paper, 78 in by 51 inches. Photo Marten Elder, courtesy Night Gallery, Los Angeles.

In Kandis Williams’s work, representations of plants—from images of them to artificial ones in containers—evoke agricultural cultivation and forced labor, showing how the production of wealth, land exploitation, and racial subjugation have often depended on one another. At the center of her collage Nay, but tell me, am I not unlucky indeed, / To arise from the earth and be only a weed?… (2020)1 is a black-and-white photograph of a Black man, hands in shackles and legs beribboned with raised scars, capped by a blurry image of a head that appears to be covered by a white hood. Fantastically, two additional dark-skinned forearms extend from the bound man’s torso with unfettered hands that seem busy at work. In the lower foreground a group of white men in suits and hats, clearly representing the slave-owning class, stares blankly at the viewer. In four sepia-toned shots at the top, a distant background depicts enslaved men and women working a cotton field in punishingly bright sunlight. Colored squares of spiky bushes photographed against a blue sky and spattered washes of vivid green watercolor interrupt these historical images. When read in conjunction with its title, the collage underscores how social categories mark certain bodies as undesirable, targeted to be uprooted and destroyed, even as it emphasizes the innate vibrancy of human and plant lives in the face of these injustices. A video accompanying the latest Made in L.A. biennial, where the collage was first shown, had Williams reflecting on how the plants exported alongside the transatlantic slave trade adds “another kind of life into the equation in dealing with structural racism.”

Kandis Williams: Installation view of “A Field,” 2020 at the Institute for Contemporary Art, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond Photo Joshua White, Courtesy ICA Virginia, Richmond.

In her 2020 solo exhibition, “A Field,” at the Institute for Contemporary Art at Virginia Commonwealth University, Williams confronted the use of forced labor on prison farms following the abolition of slavery. A small greenhouse stood on a carpet of synthetic turf at the center of the multimedia installation, surrounded by rows of fake potted plants and tall vases with artificial floral arrangements. Panels of the same turf were affixed to the gallery walls. Embedded in these plant simulacra were cut-out photos of Black bodies from earlier eras, captured while working on chain gangs, posing erotically for vintage pornographic magazines, and dancing the tango in pairs. A 10-minute video, Annexation Tango (2020), projected inside the greenhouse, showed a Black male dancer undulating and performing the tango alone, green-screened on views of the Lorton Reformatory and the Virginia State Prison Farm, among other nearby sites, where scores of incarcerated people have been made to work as part of their sentences. Williams has spoken about the exhibition as a response to historical erasure, referring to the near-archival invisibility of Black slaves, sharecroppers, and prisoners. Evoking the attendant whitewashing of Black culture is the tango, a hybrid dance form containing elements that Africans and other immigrants brought to the Río de la Plata region in South America during the nineteenth century.

The notion of “invasive” plant species, and the xenophobic tenor that can underlie this classification, has been taken up by other artists, including Okoyomon. In their works, Okoyomon has turned to the kudzu plant in particular (as have other artists, notably Aria Dean). Kudzu, often known by the epithet “the vine that ate the South,” was introduced from Japan to the American South in the 1930s, intended as a cover crop to counteract the soil erosion induced by intensive cultivation of cotton during and after slavery. Although kudzu never really took off as a cover crop, railroad and highway developers used the fast-growing plant to cover the steep cuts and embankments newly imposed on the landscape. The plant grew unchecked along transportation routes, its shoots seeming to smother trees, abandoned buildings, and other objects in its path, lending it a mythic and monstrous reputation. As an invasive species, it is illegal to grow kudzu in many states in the US. Okoyomon sees this trajectory from forced migration to criminalization as going “hand-in-hand with how the ecological system of the US relates to Blackness itself.”

Rather than presenting kudzu as a rapacious weed to be exterminated, Okoyomon has used the plants as a living medium in which other species of life are able to thrive. In their immersive exhibition “Earthseed” (2020) at the Museum für Moderne Kunst in Frankfurt, Okoyomon installed young kudzu vines and mounds of topsoil in the Zollamt gallery, a former customs office. Six faceless “angels,” constructed from black lambswool, dirt, wire, and colorful yarn, dotted the green field. (The figures resembled dolls the artist’s grandmother once made that could be remodeled again and again, unlike the plastic dolls that Okoyomon would destroy as a child.) Covid delayed the exhibition’s opening for five months, and during that time, the kudzu blanketed the topsoil and half-submerged the uncanny wool figures. The thriving plants had also enticed other creatures to inhabit the space, including crickets, grasshoppers, snails, and spiders. The installation became a scene of unruly abundance. In the spirit of the exhibition’s title, “Earthseed”—borrowed from the name of a fictional religion from the novels of Octavia E. Butler, based on the principle “God is Change”—the kudzu that Southern lore portrays as ominous is here reimagined as a wondrous agent of resilience and revitalization.

Invasive plant species also serve as important metaphors in Okoyomon’s subsequent roof garden project, Every Earthly Morning the Sky’s Light touches Ur Life is Unprecedented in its Beauty, currently installed at the Aspen Art Museum. For this installation, which Okoyomon views as a “portal,” the artist collaborated with local growers to create a large rooftop garden that mixes native plant species with invasive ones, including kudzu. The garden features ponds filled with black-algae-covered water used to irrigate the plant beds watched over by Okoyomon’s black ceramic angel sculptures. Floor tiles are spaced along the footpaths to reveal the plants’ intertwining roots as they develop. The artist explained in Frieze: “you will see the roots crawl and grow in between tiles, which is important. . . . I think there’s something especially beautiful about getting to see that errant root system and how those connections happen.” Rather than prohibit “invasive” plants in order to preserve a fixed “native” landscape—a move analogous to trying to preserve racial or cultural purity—Okoyomon (who has spoken of the natural world as “itself an object of colonization and enslavement”) creates a space for the diverse species to cross-pollinate, entangle, and coexist.

Candice Lin: View of La Charada China, 2018, The Taipei Biennial, Taipei

Unlike Okoyomon, who has made it a point to work with invasive plant species, Candice Lin focuses on plantation crops cultivated in colonies, highlighting the brutal systems of extraction and exploitation on which global markets often depended. System for a Stain—the centerpiece of “A Body Reduced to Brilliant Colour,” her 2016 exhibition at Gasworks in London—was an elaborate apparatus formed from glass jars, plastic tubes, a copper still, ceramic vessels, and other objects to distill fermented tea, sugar, and cochineal into a dark red liquid collected in a large rectangular basin. The fluid was then pumped through a plastic tube that snaked into an adjacent room, where the ruddy brew dripped out and slowly accumulated on the floor, covering the faux white marble laminate over the course of the exhibition. The installation referred primarily to the way cochineal insects in Mexico and Central America were collected and crushed to make carmine dye, a high-value colonial product. But the growing bloodlike pool at the end also viscerally evoked the regime of bodily violence that tea and sugar plantation owners inflicted on workers in other colonized lands.

In subsequent works, Lin has continued to explore how shifting desires for certain plant-based flavors and drugs have shaped colonialism and geopolitics. For her 2018 installation La Charada China (2018), created for that year’s Made in LA biennial, Lin constructed a memorial to the coolie laborers brought from China to the New World in the nineteenth century. As slavery was being abolished in some colonial empires, indentured workers were transported from China and India to fill labor shortages. More than 200,000 Chinese people were brought to the Caribbean between 1847 and 1874 alone. The center of the installation was a raised earthen platform with a depression in the form of a human body in which seeds of opium poppies, sugarcane, and poisonous plants native to the Caribbean were planted; a watering system was set up to coax their germination. The plant species Lin chose reflect the overlapping histories of the Opium Wars in China and labor rebellions on sugar plantations in the Caribbean. During the latter, workers at times resorted to toxic plants as a last-ditch means of resistance, deploying them to sicken or kill animals, themselves, or other people. The magenta glow of grow lights against the room’s silvery mylar-covered walls imparted an eerie ambiance. On one wall a faintly projected video conveyed accounts of unburied laborers’ corpses deliberately desecrated and even burned along with the carcasses of livestock to make bone charcoal, which was used to refine and whiten the plantations’ sugar.

Beatriz Cortez: View of “Chultún El Semillero,” 2021 at Smithsonian Arts + Industries Building, Washington Photo: Albert Ting, courtsey of artist.

Beatriz Cortez speaks to a different side of America’s racist agricultural history in her sculptural installations, focusing on the migration of plants between Central America and the US. The Memory Insertion Capsule (2017) is a large steel structure in the form of a speculative dwelling whose design synthesizes Mayan, Spanish Colonial, and Craftsman architectural styles, along with the tents used by refugees and the unhoused, thus evoking the mixture of these structural elements, histories, and people in Southern California and Central America. Inside the capsule, a suspended screen plays a video that tells of other crossovers between these two regions: drawing from historical film clips, photographs, posters, and other archival materials, the video splices together glimpses of plant experimentation and exportation from Central America to the US, intercut with documents related to the eugenics movement in California during the first half of the twentieth century. The Popenoe brothers are protagonists in both stories. Wilson Popenoe was chief agronomist of the notorious United Fruit Company (now Chiquita Brands International). While based in Guatemala, he focused on genetic experiments with bananas and the export of produce (such as avocados, oranges, and loquats) from Central America to California. His brother Paul, meanwhile, helped run the Pasadena-based Human Betterment Foundation, which carried out forced sterilizations of those deemed “insane and feeble-minded,” among them prison inmates, mental health patients, and thousands of immigrants, particularly from Mexico. The Popenoe brothers represent parallel historical developments in botany and eugenics, demonstrating how white supremacist beliefs underpinned the shared logics of selective breeding.

Cortez’s nomadic garden works, on the other hand, seek to bring together knowledge from ancient pre-Columbian pasts and unforeseeable futures. Her installation Chultún El Semillero, a 2021 commission for the newly reopened Smithsonian Arts + Industries Building in Washington, D.C., comprises two large steel sculptures whose forms evoke futuristic space capsules, while also recalling chultúns, huge spaces that the ancient Maya carved underground to store food and water. One structure, surrounded by grow lights, contains a miniature garden filled with plants indigenous to the Americas. The other capsule holds a seed bank and a welded steel boulder bearing an inscription based on Mayan stone carvings and codices, specifying uses for and future distribution of the seeds. The seeds offer a note of hope—the potential for a world yet to come—as well as a living connection to an ancient world predating the ravages of colonialism.

In using plants as both subject and material for their work, these artists show us how deeply—and irrevocably—our dependence on and manipulation of botanical life-forms have altered the world. They look at certain species that were instrumental in colonialism and imperialism to demonstrate that—in history, science, and metaphor—plants and people alike have been subject to classification, exploitation, and genetic experimentation. Although plants may seem to be passive, mute witnesses to human wheeling and dealing, they continue to adapt to and silently shape our world; they existed before us, and will likely outlast us. Plants contain lessons we haven’t yet learned, and can show us the way toward future worlds.

1 The work’s full title is Nay, but tell me, am I not unlucky indeed, / To arise from the earth and be only a weed? / Ever since I came out of my dark little seed, / I have tried to live rightly, but still am a—weed! / To be torn by the roots and destroyed, this my meed, / And despised by the gardener, for being—a weed. / Ah! but why was I born, when man longs to be freed / Of a thing so obnoxious and bad as a—weed? / Now, the cause of myself and my brothers I plead, / Say, can any good come of my being a—weed? / Imagine smoking weed in the streets without cops harassin’ / Imagine going to court with no trial / Lifestyle cruising blue behind my waters / No welfare supporters, more conscious of the way we raise our daughters / Days are shorter, nights are colder / Feeling like life is over, these snakes strike like a cobra / The world’s hot my son got not / Evidently, it’s elementary, they want us all gone eventually / Troopin’ out of state for a plate, knowledge / If coke was cooked without the garbage we’d all have the top dollars / Imagine everybody flashin’, fashion / Designer clothes, lacing your click up with diamond vogues / Your people holdin’ dough, no parole / No rubbers, go in raw imagine, law with no undercovers / Just some thoughts . . .

Adblock test (Why?)



"discourse" - Google News
February 01, 2022 at 04:50AM
https://ift.tt/4mH9nvcfx

Sowing Discourse - ARTnews
"discourse" - Google News
https://ift.tt/oJnajLbxe
https://ift.tt/yf3tHeGWu

Britain's drinking problem is a lot bigger than Boris Johnson - CNN

Holly Thomas is a writer and editor based in London. She is morning editor at Katie Couric Media. She tweets @HolstaT. The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author. View more opinion on CNN.

(CNN)According to reports, multiple parties where alcohol was served -- in breach of the government's own Covid restrictions -- took place in Whitehall during the pandemic. Most recently, Downing Street has admitted that up to 30 guests gathered to celebrate Boris Johnson's birthday on June 19, 2020, when almost all indoor gatherings of more than two people were banned.

In an attempt to defend his presence at a "bring your own booze" garden party held at No 10 -- his official residence -- in May 2020, Johnson told journalists that he'd thought he was at a "work event."
Holly Thomas
It's an insipid excuse -- and according to lawyers including Adam Wagner, a barrister and expert in Covid law, almost certainly legally indefensible. But as Johnson probably realizes, it isn't just the fact of our nation's cabin crew boozing their way through the pandemic that offends the British populace.
The real insult is that while we abstained, he and his colleagues did not. And incredible though it is that so many people shouldering huge professional responsibilities were prepared to attend these potentially dangerous gatherings, the ingrained presenteeism in Britain when bosses or colleagues hit the bar has always come at a heavy price.
The Metropolitan Police is investigating "a number" of these occasions, alongside a separate inquiry led by civil servant Sue Gray. In a stripped-back version of Gray's report made public on Monday, the Cabinet Office said, "The excessive consumption of alcohol is not appropriate in a professional workplace at any time. Steps must be taken to ensure that every Government Department has a clear and robust policy in place covering the consumption of alcohol in the workplace."
Prime Minister Johnson with customers in the beer garden during a visit to a pub on April 19, 2021.
That's a fine idea, but these statements fail to capture the scope of the problem or address the reality that it's not just alcohol inside the workplace that's at issue. And while the report scrutinizes Johnson, it's important to consider that he wasn't the only attendee at these parties -- nor will these investigations and his ultimate political fate exorcize the toxic element of British culture they represent.
Regular and excessive bouts of group drinking are chronic throughout British working culture -- and the political world of Westminster is an exaggerated caricature of what goes on elsewhere. In non-lockdown times, Whitehall pubs spill onto the streets from 6 p.m. onward -- and overflow even more with proximity to the Houses of Parliament. Drinking carries on until late every weekday. Junior advisers know the value of showing up for pints if they want to endear themselves to their superiors and as a result, journalists cruising for stories do the same, habitually stalking the House of Commons' heavily subsidized bars.
An array of risks -- which include regular hangovers, doing something you'll regret under the influence, finding yourself drunk and friendless after dark, and hemorrhaging your paycheck -- are priced in when you enter this world.
According to a 2020 report by the British Medical Journal, MPs in Westminster are almost three times more prone to "risky drinking" than the general public, more likely to binge drink, more likely drink at least four days per week, and more likely to tot up a minimum of 10 units on a typical day. It's chaotic, laddish, and can expose the inexperienced or vulnerable to a deluge of professional and personal hazards -- not least to their health, as a result of imbibing so much so often.
Much of the problem stems from the fact that pressure to partake isn't just social -- it's professional. As well as a legitimized excuse to get wasted, work drinks are often framed as a career-building necessity.
They're an informal chance to network, gain intel, form crucial connections and simply show themselves willing. Attending is a mark of dedication the significance of which seems to outweigh the precarious positions regularly doing so can put people in -- particularly the young, inexperienced and physically lightweight. As a result, it's far easier for some people to get ahead this way than others.
Work-related drinking is inherently prejudiced in favor of people with spare cash, free evenings, a high alcohol tolerance and few responsibilities outside of work.
In Westminster as elsewhere, this typically translates to men. On Westminster's political side, men outnumber women two to one. This in turn tilts the scale for Britain's political media — as of 2016, just one in five of those registered with the daily press gallery were women. Because of the associated long hours, social obligations and inflexibility, Westminster is an especially inhospitable environment for women who have children.
The entitlement and unfairness nurtured by this environment have been evident throughout the No 10 party controversy. When a 7-year-old girl wrote in March 2021 to tell Johnson that she was canceling her birthday party to avoid the risk of infection, he wrote back to say that she was "setting a great example."
When a video leaked in December 2021 showing government adviser Allegra Stratton joking about an alleged No 10 Christmas party in 2020, Johnson said that he could make "no excuses for the frivolity" of his staff, and insisted no such event took place (Stratton resigned the next day.) Days later, a picture emerged of the Prime Minister hosting a Christmas quiz, while per a source, staff conferred on questions and knocked back fizz, wine and beer.
Get our free weekly newsletter

Sign up for CNN Opinion's newsletter.

Join us on Twitter and Facebook

Ahead of the party which fell the night before Prince Philip's funeral, staff reportedly took a suitcase to the local shop to fill it with alcohol -- a tradition which sources say dates back to Prime Minister David Cameron's time. No 10 then apparently hosted an extended booze-up so off the chain that Johnson's baby son Wilfred's garden swing was broken in the ruckus. The next day, Philip's widow -- and wife of more than 70 years -- Queen Elizabeth, mourned alone in a cavernous Windsor chapel.
If it is decided that the lockdown parties at No 10 over the pandemic broke the law, there will need to be a political reckoning. But these events also point to a much broader, far older problem. Westminster exemplifies a national workplace drinks culture that long predates the pandemic, and has always put unjustifiable pressure on those who fear their career depends on participating.
The contempt that participants showed for the rules in place to keep people safe can come as little shock given the inequity already inherent in their favorite pastime.

Adblock test (Why?)



"Opinion" - Google News
February 01, 2022 at 03:11AM
https://ift.tt/x0QdMXrhP

Britain's drinking problem is a lot bigger than Boris Johnson - CNN
"Opinion" - Google News
https://ift.tt/I0RT6fKeh
Shoes Man Tutorial
Pos News Update
Meme Update
Korean Entertainment News
Japan News Update

Opinion | After the Gray Report, Boris Johnson Is Hanging by a Thread - The New York Times

LONDON — Boris Johnson, Britain’s classics-loving prime minister, has long been fascinated by the fall of the Roman Empire. Now his government risks a fall of its own.

The decline in his fortunes has been swift and dramatic. For weeks, the news media heaved with accounts of lockdown breaches: There was a garden party, a birthday party, a staff goodbye party — Mr. Johnson at all of them. His approval ratings plummeted, and apoplectic Conservative legislators threatened to oust him. Then the police got involved, opening an inquiry into whether the prime minister broke the laws he created.

On Monday, the challenge facing Mr. Johnson was laid bare. An inquiry led by Sue Gray, a senior civil servant with a reputation for hard-nosed investigations, found that “failures of leadership and judgment” lay behind the gatherings, a number of which “should not have been allowed to take place.” The police, she said, were investigating 12 of them.

“I will fix it,” a defiant Mr. Johnson told Parliament. But he was met with ringing jeers and calls to resign. His position is precarious: If 54 Conservative lawmakers send party officials letters of no confidence, explicitly challenging Mr. Johnson’s leadership, it will automatically set off a secret ballot. The prime minister’s fate would then rest in the hands of his colleagues.

Whether Mr. Johnson is removed or granted a reprieve, the past few weeks amount to a remarkable fall from grace. A little over two years ago, he led the Conservative Party to a resounding electoral victory and sat atop an 80-seat majority. There was talk of a decade in power. Now, with his authority severely wounded, his tenure is hanging by a thread.

Behind the machinations at Westminster, crucially, is overwhelming public anger. The national mood is furious, disdainful: Nearly two-thirds of the country wants Mr. Johnson to resign. Long inured to his scandals, Britons seem to have drawn the line at partying through the worst of the pandemic.

The details are damning enough. The organizer of one of the gatherings, an aide to Mr. Johnson, emailed 100 officials inviting them to “bring your own bottle” and “make the most of the lovely weather” in the garden at 10 Downing Street, the prime minister’s official residence. That was on May 20, 2020. Britain was two months into a punishing national lockdown, and people were allowed to see family and friends only one on one in public parks.

At another of the gatherings, nearly a year later, an official was sent off to fill a suitcase with bottles of wine as others set up an impromptu D.J. booth in the Downing Street basement. By then, April 16, 2021, Britain had registered more than 150,000 coronavirus deaths. The next day, Queen Elizabeth followed the rules and sat alone at the funeral for her husband, Prince Philip.

As more and more lurid details have emerged, the Conservative Party has steadily fallen in the polls, and Mr. Johnson’s approval rating has sunk to 22 percent. For someone once known as the Heineken Tory — the political equivalent of the inoffensive Dutch beer that appeals to wine and liquor drinkers alike — it’s a catastrophic development.

The loss of popular appeal is bad for any democratic leader. But for Mr. Johnson, whose success in securing the leadership of the Conservative Party depended on his electoral charm, it’s disastrous. The triumph of December 2019 feels like an age ago. Two years of chaotic government marked by tax increases, embarrassing policy reversals and political misjudgments have caused many Conservative legislators to doubt whether Mr. Johnson could lead them to victory in a future election. If he can’t, they reason, there’s no point in his staying in place.

Ominously, Mr. Johnson has bled support from all wings and generations of his party. A large chunk of those elected for the first time in 2019 — who owe their seats to Mr. Johnson — have spent this month openly plotting against him, with around 20 of these legislators thought to have sent in letters of no confidence. And Conservative grandees with nothing to lose have piled on, with David Davis, a former cabinet minister, telling Mr. Johnson, “In the name of God, go.”

Discontent has been brewing for a while. Legislators have long chafed at Mr. Johnson’s stubborn tendency to go it alone, his lack of interest in building party unity and the chaotic way in which his government is run. Major missteps — such as a resistance to providing poor pupils with free meals over the school holidays — alienated some of his supporters in Parliament. Many of them waited in vain to be offered promotions that ultimately went to the prime minister’s long-term allies. By the time the latest scandal broke, they had acquired a taste for treachery and rebellion.

Mr. Johnson has spent much of the past two weeks attempting to persuade wavering legislators to stick by him. The Gray report, despite being stripped back to avoid prejudicing the police inquiry, will put such support to the test. Even if Mr. Johnson manages to ride out the storm, his troubles are far from over. The investigation by the Metropolitan Police, which could involve the humiliation of the prime minister and his staff being interviewed as suspects, will be deeply damaging. And local elections in May will give the country’s voters a chance to display their anger.

Back in November, Mr. Johnson was musing aloud about the fall of Rome. “When things start to go wrong,” he said, “they can go wrong at extraordinary speed.” He had no idea how right he was.

Eleni Courea (@EleniCourea) is the deputy editor of Politico’s London Playbook.

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: letters@nytimes.com.

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.

Adblock test (Why?)



"Opinion" - Google News
January 31, 2022 at 11:57PM
https://ift.tt/OfzlQoMSu

Opinion | After the Gray Report, Boris Johnson Is Hanging by a Thread - The New York Times
"Opinion" - Google News
https://ift.tt/I0RT6fKeh
Shoes Man Tutorial
Pos News Update
Meme Update
Korean Entertainment News
Japan News Update

Sunday, January 30, 2022

Opinion | Amanda Gorman’s Message to the World - The New York Times

Amanda Gorman delivering “The Hill We Climb” on Jan. 20, 2021.
Pool photo by Patrick Semansky

To the Editor:

If You’re Alive, You’re Afraid,” by Amanda Gorman (Opinion guest essay, Sunday Review, Jan. 23), was one of the most insightful, provocative and emotionally uplifting pieces I have read in a very long time. It should be required reading for all world and American leaders.

In just a relatively few words, Ms. Gorman, the poet at the inauguration a year ago, managed to touch my heart and the hearts of so many others who are in constant emotional turmoil because of events over the past several years: fear of getting sick, fear of losing one’s life or the lives of loved ones, and a fear of democracy on the edge of collapse, here and around the world.

The rise of overt racism, antisemitism and hatred of immigrants that has taken hold of so many of us has been sheer torture.

It is time for us to heal. That will not come from hatred, it will not come from greed and it will not come from destructive behavior. It will come only from compassion, love, patience and tolerance.

Morton H. Grusky
Santa Fe, N.M.

To the Editor:

In this time of widespread fear in America, Amanda Gorman sends an important message: Strength comes from actively coping with fear rather than suppressing it. Recognizing that fear is an automatic and necessary alert to danger, Ms. Gorman provides an implied rebuttal to the common advice parents often give to their children, “Don’t be afraid.”

Instead, worried families can best comfort their understandably anxious children by asking them, “How can I help you feel safe, in spite of your scary feelings?” That discussion can reassure children, validate their feelings and let them know that their own actions, words and/or play can make them feel safer and less overwhelmed.

Robert Abramovitz
New York
The writer, a child psychiatrist and child trauma expert, is a senior consultant at the National Child Trauma Workforce Institute.

To the Editor:

As an American abroad, I was moved to tears by Amanda Gorman’s openness, clarity and courage! In a time of flagging hopes, spiraling hatred and wholesale despair, her words shone with their resilience and honesty.

Any time I worry about being overtaken by my own fears I will reread it and continue my efforts to produce positive change in our country.

Reavis Hilz-Ward
Frankfurt

Allison Zaucha for The New York Times

To the Editor:

What is it like teaching during Omicron?

Imagine you are assigned to cater a dinner party, only you don’t know how many people are expected to show up. You are given a list of the guests, their allergies, food preferences, who is vegan, kosher, halal. Perhaps half the guests will stay home. You will know who is coming to dinner only when you open your door. You are expected to provide an excellent dinner, regardless of who is present to enjoy it.

The next night, you are scheduled to have another party for those same guests. But with a slightly different menu. Something that builds upon the previous meal. Except for the people who didn’t show up for the first party. They need to have the meal they missed and the new meal. Again, you will not know who is coming to your dinner party until you open your doors.

And the people who are still home need to have all the meals they missed. Even if they don’t have an appetite.

And that is sort of what it is like to teach during Omicron.

The remarkable thing is, you would not know how crazy this is if you joined me in visiting our classes. What you would see are teachers thoroughly engaged in their work. You would see our students enthusiastically engaged in the topics at hand. You would hear laughter and animated conversations, complex discussions and thoughtful questions. You would see learning taking place.

David Getz
New York
The writer is a middle school principal.

Damon Winter/The New York Times

To the Editor:

Re “We Need to Think the Unthinkable About the U.S.,” by Jonathan Stevenson and Steven Simon (Opinion guest essay, Jan. 14):

I agree with the article, but here’s my unthinkable: secession — no war, no violence, just go separate ways. It is increasingly clear that there are two competing stories of American values.

Let’s actually consider what will happen if Texas splits from the United States and is followed by a number of other red states. Maybe by thinking the unthinkable we can prevent it. Or maybe it is better to live in two different countries, separated by philosophical differences, while cooperating for economic and defense reasons, as in Europe.

Think of how productive both countries could be if they didn’t have to waste time arguing over the things that currently divide us.

Dan Evans
Huntington, N.Y.

Illustration by Shoshana Schultz/The New York Times; photographs by Aurelien Meunier, Chip Somodevilla, Mikhail Svetlov, Ira Wyman via Getty Images

To the Editor:

Re “Playing a Long Game, Putin Has America Where He Wants It,” by Fiona Hill (Opinion guest essay, Jan. 25):

Ms. Hill’s excellent essay underscores a serious weakness in the government of the United States. Simply stated, this country does not have a long game, and our cultural bias toward short-term results means that we have little idea how to play it.

Whoever is in political power disregards thinking the long game in favor of retaining political superiority and one-upmanship against adversaries in our own country.

Playing against China’s long game of attracting foreign companies, many U.S. firms moved manufacturing to China to achieve short-term profits. The pandemic exposed the inherent weakness of manufacturing far away. Now our country is faced with the difficult task of unwinding the supply chain of various goods, cheap and expensive, after we victimized ourselves with critical, even lifesaving, goods in short supply during this pandemic.

Economics, business, politics, the military and foreign relations are all very much intertwined. Except for strategic thinkers like Ms. Hill, we tend to compartmentalize them, to our detriment. It behooves the leaders of this nation, both political and business, to understand our close allies and our adversaries well in all aspects, so we can take the best actions in our long-term national interests. I am not sure I will live long enough to see this happen.

Ben Myers
Harvard, Mass.

To the Editor:

Re “Democrats Face Costly New Slog on Voting Curbs” (front page, Jan. 16):

Many of the issues regarding the new voting regulations being implemented by both Democratic- and Republican-controlled state legislatures could be mitigated if the United States adopted a national identity card issued — free — by the federal government to everyone 18 years and older.

The card would confirm both citizenship and identity, and could be used as an ID for voting, banking, domestic travel, and purchases of tobacco and alcoholic beverages. In fact, a prototype of this card already exists: the U.S. passport card.

Many of the concerns voiced by Democrats regarding burdensome paperwork requirements that impedes voting by disadvantaged Americans and by Republicans regarding alleged fraud by voters would be eliminated. Anyone who believes that a mandatory national identity card raises a privacy issue should avoid using a smartphone!

Ira Sohn
New York

Eager Tourist

To the Editor:

Re “Vegan Travel: It’s Not Fringe Anymore” (Travel, nytimes.com, Jan. 21):

It was heartening to hear that veganism is being taken seriously in the travel industry. The article cites an elevated environmental awareness that is prompting people to go vegan. Preventing further environmental degradation is indeed an important reason to become vegan.

But an equally vital reason is the world’s nonhuman animals that are regularly abused and exploited in our agricultural system as well as in fashion, entertainment and science.

Veganism is so much more than a diet; it’s a commitment to live as compassionate a life as possible.

April Lang
New York

Adblock test (Why?)



"Opinion" - Google News
January 30, 2022 at 11:30PM
https://ift.tt/INdQw9EtS

Opinion | Amanda Gorman’s Message to the World - The New York Times
"Opinion" - Google News
https://ift.tt/V9lgZrXHI
Shoes Man Tutorial
Pos News Update
Meme Update
Korean Entertainment News
Japan News Update

Local Opinion: Helping hands show the best of Tucsonans - Arizona Daily Star

Beth Connolly, left, and Dianne Crocetti, right.

The following is the opinion and analysis of the writer:

I would like to share with the people of Tucson a story about kindness and selflessness. I hope that it is inspiring and will serve as an example of the goodness of human nature to uplift us during these times, and an example of Tucsonans at their best.

I moved to Tucson during the pandemic with a recent diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer. This was after a very long absence from Scottsdale, where I had grown up. Soon after, I began weekly trips to Phoenix for chemotherapy treatments.

With the effects of the chemo, I realized I could not drive myself to Phoenix and back to Tucson. Also, I could not handle the complicated freeways, which were a shocking far cry from the Scottsdale of 50 years ago, where I had grown up with Shea Boulevard and Bell Road being the ends of the world!

I happened to mention the problematic trips to a Florida friend. Can you believe that several days later a friend of hers, to whom she mentioned the issue, was speaking to her “Tucson Friends” and soon Dianne and Beth were in touch and volunteering to make the drive with me! What are the chances the stars would align like that?

The trips to Phoenix are the highlight of my week. The time in the car is filled with stress-busting stories (sometimes about Dianne’s uncle, singer Dean Martin), inspirational good advice (“hope and anything is possible”), stories about Beth and Dianne’s adorable dog Rascal, and travel stories and upcoming plans.

The trips to and from Phoenix are key to reducing chemo anxiety and making treatments bearable. Dianne and Beth have propped me up when the spirit sags, gotten up at the crack of dawn to accommodate appointments in Phoenix, driven at night, been flexible about changing schedules, and zenlike about less-than-pleasant traffic conditions. Yet, through it all, they are positive, supportive and happy. It truly makes a huge difference in my life and treatments.

Beth and Dianne are role models for me and I hope for all of us. They have mentioned, “People have helped us when we needed it, and now it is our turn to give back.” I see their kindness as a commitment to walking the walk for peace, healing and unity. I am so grateful to Dianne and Beth and hope they inspire us all to walk a similar walk. I am proud to know Dianne and Beth, who stand out to me as the best of Tucsonans.

And I want to mention, the five people who were involved in making the stars align so beautifully, are now planning a get-together, either in-person or via Zoom.

Nancy Estes is a retired foreign service officer specializing in development and humanitarian assistance working for USAID. She lives in Tucson.

Adblock test (Why?)



"Opinion" - Google News
January 30, 2022 at 08:00PM
https://ift.tt/K7OGBA9L4

Local Opinion: Helping hands show the best of Tucsonans - Arizona Daily Star
"Opinion" - Google News
https://ift.tt/V9lgZrXHI
Shoes Man Tutorial
Pos News Update
Meme Update
Korean Entertainment News
Japan News Update

Opinion: New school designs have abandoned beauty - The Cincinnati Enquirer

Saturday, January 29, 2022

This Kirby Puckett Bunt Will Cleanse You from HOF Discourse - Off The Bench - Off The Bench Baseball

israelob.blogspot.com
AL Central

This is a man named Kirby Puckett. The GIF below features him as a 24-year-old rookie center fielder for the Minnesota Twins in 1984. Here, he executes a perfect bunt single:

Much has happened in the intervening 38 years since that bunt. Puckett played 12 seasons in MLB, winning a batting title, two World Series championships, and ten All-Star honors. On September 28, 1995, an errant pitch ended his season and, as it turned out, his career. The following spring Puckett was diagnosed with glaucoma. In 2001, he was elected to the Hall of Fame on his first ballot. The following year, he allegedly pulled a woman into a restaurant bathroom against her will and was subsequently arrested for false imprisonment and criminal sexual assault. He would be cleared of all charges in 2003, but not before the exposition of years of abusive behavior towards his wife and mistress. On March 6, 2005, he died at the age of 45.

Puckett’s legacy as a ballplayer and a human being is an impossibly tangled labyrinth. That’s true for all of us to different extents. Professionally, he was superb in every facet of the game. By the standards of his time period— presumably considered by 2001 HOF voters— he was a career .318 hitter who led the league in hits four times. He collected six Gold Gloves and six Silver Sluggers. Indisputably, Puckett was an icon of the Twins franchise and remains one of the top five players in their history to this day. More than that, he charmed fans and media with his bright smile and friendly public persona. He was chosen as one of “USA’s Five Most Caring Athletes” by USA Weekend in 1995 and won the Roberto Clemente Award in 1996. The baseball world wept collectively for the tragic, premature demise of his career. He was easy to love.

It wasn’t until after he received baseball’s highest individual honor that we learned the truth about his private life. His wife filed for divorce in 2002 claiming domestic violence and an “irretrievable breakdown” of their marriage. His longtime girlfriend became similarly fed up, as documented by Sports Illustrated’s George Dohrmann. “Kirby was, of course, an ideal family man–even though, truth be told, he wasn’t even an ideal scoundrel, because he also had cheated on his mistress of many years with a passel of other sad and lonely women. And you thought the fans were duped. She was so shocked at his perfidy, the mistress of many years, that she began to seek comfort in commiseration with the wife.”

The Hall of Fame

If Puckett had been eligible for the HOF in 2022 instead of 2001, would he have been elected? Through a more modern statistical lens, the answer isn’t as clear. WAR and JAWS didn’t exist 21 years ago. His 51.1 bWAR is soft by HOF center fielder standards. He ranks 24th in career JAWS at the position, just behind Johnny Damon, who received only 1.9 percent of votes in 2018, his only year on the ballot.

Moreover, the Hall’s infamous character clause does much heavier lifting these days. Omar Vizquel— a HOF candidate whose own on-field credentials are borderline— was arrested for domestic violence in December 2020 in the middle of the 2021 voting process. His then-wife publicly detailed the physical and emotional abuse she endured over the course of their relationship. HOF voting is insignificant by comparison. Nevertheless, his share of the vote slipped to 23.9 percent in 2022 after peaking at 52.6 percent two years earlier.

Vizquel was not the only domestic abuser on the ballot. Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens, and Andruw Jones have all been credibly accused of violence against women. Curt Schilling‘s litany of dangerous, violent, and hateful rhetoric prevented his own enshrinement. Additionally, several players on this year’s ballot have connections to performance-enhancing drugs, notably including both Bonds and Clemens as well as David Ortizthe only player elected in this cycle.

Rightly or wrongly, Puckett is most definitely not the only domestic abuser in the Hall of Fame. Ortiz is not the only (alleged) PED user in the Hall either.

I don’t know too many athletes, even the ones who claim to be these wonderful Christians, who aren’t out doing some terrible things. It’s insane. There is something terribly wrong with this, because it doesn’t just start in the major leagues. It starts when they’re young, like in high school, and there is a code they follow.

Kirby Puckett’s ex-wife

The character clause, of course, is the brainchild of Kennesaw Mountain Landis, MLB’s first commissioner and a HOFer himself. Despite his insistence on character as a HOF criterion, he was more directly responsible for the perpetuation of segregation than any other individual in baseball history. It’s no coincidence that Jackie Robinson signed with the Dodgers less than a year after Landis’ death.

***

Baseball can be difficult to love, especially this time of year. The sport has never been more confusing and exhausting. Measuring the on-field accomplishments of Sammy Sosa or Gary Sheffield is difficult enough, but comparing the nuances of Ortiz’s PED connections to Álex Rodríguez’s is mentally draining. Weighing in the tribulations of Mindy McReady, the suicide victim who was allegedly statutorily raped by Roger Clemens starting at age 15, is more than most fans or HOF voters are qualified to handle. Behind all of this is the backdrop of MLB’s lockout that threatens the 2022 season.

That’s not to say we shouldn’t have these conversations. Whitewashing over domestic violence or the other heinous acts of some players is tantamount to denial and acceptance. Whether or not such evils disqualify someone from the HOF is in the eye of the beholder. For entirely different reasons, the same can be said for PED users, though their transgressions are more baseball-specific.

Late January is the winter solstice of MLB. We have never been so far from the light. Bonds’ 762 home runs and seven MVPs are as much a part of his story as BALCO labs or his mistress’ testimony of domestic abuse. To ignore his entire legacy, good and bad, is disingenuous at best and complicit at worst. Nevertheless, it makes it so damn hard to remember why we love this stupid game in the first place.

Kirby Puckett is a Hall of Famer. Whether or not he belongs there is another matter. Was he truly good enough as a player or as a man? That’s not just a complicated question, it’s also mentally grueling and wearisome— doubly so for the reverberations of what his enshrinement means for Barry Bonds. That’s why it’s all the more important to remember why we bother to care in the first place. Baseball— real baseball with a ball and a bat— is beautiful. It doesn’t feel like it in January, but we’ll get back to it again. Eventually.

Meanwhile, take the time to appreciate this bunt one more time to alleviate your headache:

What a gorgeous bunt!

*Names of the surviving abused persons and links to documentation of their trauma have been intentionally withheld from this article.

Adblock test (Why?)



"discourse" - Google News
January 29, 2022 at 10:06PM
https://ift.tt/1ubipvajG

This Kirby Puckett Bunt Will Cleanse You from HOF Discourse - Off The Bench - Off The Bench Baseball
"discourse" - Google News
https://ift.tt/AKOCkypMR
https://ift.tt/0AEUma2L3

Opinion: More prison time for gang affiliation doesn’t work - The Mercury News

This opinion piece was written for Mosaic Vision, an extension of the Mosaic Journalism Workshop, a summer program that provides real-world journalism training to Bay Area high school students.

Sending youth offenders to prison for longer terms because they are gang members, or because the police claim they are, is wrong — and has proven ineffective. It’s time to abolish harsh sentencing and focus on real solutions to youth crime.

In 1988, California passed the Street Terrorism Enforcement and Prevention Act, or STEP, which advocates argued would protect communities from gang violence by adding increased prison time for committing gang-related felonies.

More than a generation since the act’s passage, gang-sentencing enhancements have not only proven ineffective, but also have disproportionately targeted low-income communities of color. There’s no proof that the law has influenced the rate of serious crime.

Joanna Molina, a single mother of two, was raised in East San Jose in a single-parent, low-income household and experienced the harm of gang enhancements. She entered the criminal justice system at 17 when she was arrested for carjacking and robbery.

The Santa Clara County district attorney’s office fought to have her tried as an adult. Had the office prevailed, Molina could have faced an additional 12 to 15 years of prison time with gang enhancements. Instead, with community support, she was sentenced to three months in juvenile hall and six months at Santa Clara County’s Muriel Wright rehabilitation ranch.

“I wasn’t this person that the DA was portraying me to be,” Molina said. “It would be a waste of life to send me to prison for all those years.”

Unfortunately, her ex-husband who grew up in the system didn’t have the community support during his trial that Joanna had. His seven-year term was extended to 25 years with gang enhancements, which he’s serving at California State Prison Solano. Molina also has friends who entered the prison system as kids and came out as adults, half of their lives wasted.

Molina, who identifies as Chicana, believes that the system targets Black and brown people. She believes prosecutors looked at her clothing and her East San Jose address and incorrectly labeled her a gang member. “They basically assumed I was [in a gang] because of the area where I lived and what I was wearing at the time,” she said.

The state’s gang database, CalGang, lists 150,000 alleged gang members, 85% of them Black or Latino people ages 9 to 65. Molina advocated to get her name removed from the database, but many others unfairly listed are unable to advocate for their removal.
It is unjust to give someone a longer sentence simply because they have gang ties or because overzealous police claim they do.

“There is no way someone who spent 15 to 30 years in prison can come back out and be a productive member of society,” Molina said. They have no context for how to thrive in a community beyond prison walls, she said. “We contribute to the homelessness and the substance abuse issue by sending people away for that long,” Molina said.

Gang enhancements also damage children and families. Molina said. “There’s different heads to this monster that really ends up affecting generations.”

According to the National Institute of Justice, children whose parents enter the criminal justice system face a host of challenges and difficulties that include psychological strain, antisocial behavior, suspension or expulsion from school, economic hardship and criminal activity.

“One of the adverse childhood experiences is having a loved one in jail,” said Molina, who hasn’t taken her kids to see their father recently because she doesn’t want to risk their mental health. “I have to be prepared to somehow make sure that they heal from that trauma.”

Sentencing enhancements do little to address the roots of youth crime. We should instead provide each child with a high-quality education and enact proven anti-gang measures. “If I had been taught at a young age that there’s a different way to love your people, by showing them how to advocate, by changing policy and being involved, then I think my life would have been different,” Molina said.

Offering families education and effective anti-gang social programs would better protect communities and help youth at risk. Gang sentencing enhancements should be abolished.

Molina now works at a law firm and is a first-year student at Lincoln Law School. She hopes to improve society and the legal system. She wants to advocate for children, eliminate gang-enhanced sentencing and improve society. She said, “I would like to be able to do something for my community.”

Dali Yadira Guerrero Fern​​ández is a sophomore at Cristo Rey San José Jesuit High School. She is a member of the Mosaic Vision high school journalism program.

Adblock test (Why?)



"Opinion" - Google News
January 30, 2022 at 06:55AM
https://ift.tt/ci5EzGRpI

Opinion: More prison time for gang affiliation doesn’t work - The Mercury News
"Opinion" - Google News
https://bit.ly/340gKlO
Shoes Man Tutorial
Pos News Update
Meme Update
Korean Entertainment News
Japan News Update

Search

Featured Post

I just paid $9.99 for a carton of 18 eggs. Will prices ever drop? | Opinion - Sacramento Bee

[unable to retrieve full-text content] I just paid $9.99 for a carton of 18 eggs. Will prices ever drop? | Opinion    Sacramento Bee ...

Postingan Populer