Rechercher dans ce blog

Thursday, July 1, 2021

Opinion | Canada's record-breaking temperatures are an alarm. We must act. - The Washington Post

Residents of Canada’s westernmost province, British Columbia, have been living the opening pages of a post-apocalyptic novel for several days now, as a heat dome settled over the Pacific Northwest.

On Sunday, Lytton, B.C., set the country’s record for hottest temperature at 114.98 degrees (46.1 Celsius), displacing the previous record of 113 degrees (45 Celsius), set in 1937. On Monday, Lytton set the record again: 118.22 degrees (47.9 Celsius). On Tuesday, it set one for a third day in a row: 121.28 degrees (49.6 Celsius). On Wednesday, a wildfire forced the entire town to evacuate. Across the province, the heat wave is suspected of contributing to the loss of dozens of lives and stretched first responders thin. Several school districts have closed and crops have been stressed.

The ideal number of times an 84-year-old heat record should be broken in a week is zero, not three and counting. But this is what climate change has brought us. And we knew it was coming. In 2020, a study published in Science Advances warned of rising temperatures and the risks they pose to humans. The research article, titled “The emergence of heat and humidity too severe for human tolerance,” found that “reported occurrences of extreme TW [wet-bulb temperature] have increased rapidly at weather stations and in reanalysis data over the last four decades and that parts of the subtropics are very close to the 35°C survivability limit, which has likely already been reached over both sea and land. These trends highlight the magnitude of the changes that have taken place as a result of the global warming to date.”

As if on cue, thus arrived the heat dome.

Years of dire warnings about climate change and its effects may have inured some of us to the alarming idea of life on a planet so deeply altered by human behavior that it is increasingly inhospitable to our survival, but the past few days have reminded millions of us what that looks like in practice. The immediate question is how governments, organizations, families and friends can take care of folks, reduce suffering and save lives, especially those of the most vulnerable among us. Following that, we must ask ourselves how we can process these extreme weather events in a way that underwrites immediate, aggressive climate action.

It is tempting to give up. The tasks ahead of us are daunting, and some of the consequences of our slow, inadequate climate measures are locked in. But nihilism serves few of us, while hope and action will serve many.

In March 2020, just as the coronavirus pandemic began to sweep the world, Damian Carrington wrote in the Guardian: “There’s no ‘deadline’ to save the world.” While “deadlines can focus efforts,” he wrote, “even if this deadline is missed, it will not be too late, because every act reduces human suffering.”

That message of possibility is essential, a necessary frame if we are to mobilize in the face of tougher, more frequent challenges induced by climate change. Strategies of mitigation and adaptation can improve and save lives; as despairing as extreme weather events are, they ought not to drive us into morbid complacency. Indeed, it is an act of privilege to give in to despair while we might still create a better world.

Creating a better world, however, takes structural changes at the level of states. While we ought to be focused on improving our climate fortunes, individual behavioral changes must be secondary to national and subnational policy that retools how we govern ourselves and how we do business. Last year, Seth Klein, in his book “A Good War: Mobilizing Canada for the Climate Emergency,” laid out a program for such change. Whether you appreciate the war frame or not — I do — or agree with each idea or not, the action outline gives plenty of suggestions for transformative adaptation and mitigation polices. At the very least, Klein outlined the scale at which we ought to be operating.

The heat wave in the Pacific Northwest should focus our minds — once those sweating through the heat can focus again, at any rate. The latest extreme weather event should impel us to demand more from our governments and should remind us that politicians will not do enough to address climate change and its effects on their own. They won’t jump; we’ll have to push them.

How do we begin? In Canada, election speculation is rampant, with an expected vote in the fall. That’s a good place to renew our efforts on climate, committing to making aggressive climate action the top issue and ensuring that breaking weather records doesn’t become our national pastime.

Read more:

Adblock test (Why?)



"Opinion" - Google News
July 01, 2021 at 11:07PM
https://ift.tt/3qGZbhJ

Opinion | Canada's record-breaking temperatures are an alarm. We must act. - The Washington Post
"Opinion" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2FkSo6m
Shoes Man Tutorial
Pos News Update
Meme Update
Korean Entertainment News
Japan News Update

Opinion: Clearly labeling opinion journalism is essential. We're making sure to do so on social media. - The San Diego Union-Tribune

Hall is the editorial and opinion director at The San Diego Union-Tribune. He is (always) on Twitter, @sduncovered. His email is matthew.hall@sduniontribune.com.

When I took the helm of the Opinion section of The San Diego Union-Tribune more than five and a half years ago, we faced a decision.

I’m not talking about our endorsement in the 2016 presidential election, although that was a heck of a choice we faced, too. I’m talking about how we chose to brand our social media on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to help our editorials, commentaries, letters to the editor and editorial cartoons surface and stand out in a crowd.

On Twitter and Instagram, we created @sdutIdeas. On Facebook, we maintained @sdutopinion, which is how the page was created on May 5, 2011, with a post that read, “This is the new Opinion page. Enjoy.” Trying to change the Facebook account back then required cutting through too much red tape, so we focused on the other platforms.

Why pick “Ideas” and not “Opinion” on Twitter? Because Twitter has character limits and because I wanted to emphasize the “ideas” aspect of our journalism. Everyone has opinions, my thinking went. Not everyone has original or even thoughtful ideas.

I wanted the Union-Tribune Ideas & Opinion section to be a place for discussing ideas and for provoking thought, for involving everyone, and for improving the region, every day, for the small price of a paid subscription.

I love the name @sdutIdeas, but today we say goodbye to it. Today, we’re announcing a rebranding of our Twitter and Instagram accounts to @sdutopinion. It’s probably what we should have done all along. But as regular readers of our section know, I’m not above reconsidering a position, either in philosophy or in actuality.

But this switch isn’t just about having our branding be the same across the board on social media. It’s also about media literacy, and trust. Studies show people still have a hard time telling the difference between news and opinion.

The news side of the Union-Tribune covers stories without bias, impartially, without “fear or favor,” as the saying goes. The opinion side follows the same ethical principles, but our opinion journalism is, well, opinionated, by nature. We still try to respect and involve all views and all people, but we have a point of view, and we own it.

These days, trust in the news is cratering. Gallup surveys show just 40 percent of Americans trust mass media. A recent Reuters Institute poll showed that Americans have less trust in the news than residents of 45 other countries, at a mere 29 percent.

Clearer labeling of opinion journalism is one way we are trying to reverse that decline. We clearly label our team’s journalism on our website and social media posts as opinion. Now we want the brand itself to signify that. If you see a tweet or an Instagram post from @sdutopinion, know that it is from our opinion team.

It may be that you’re seeing our own editorials or readers’ letters to the editor or commentary from experts or people with lived experiences. But know that it is opinion journalism, held to high standards of fairness, accuracy and civility, regardless of who wrote it. We want you to know that, to understand and appreciate it.

As of now, when you search for our journalism on Twitter, Instagram or Facebook, please type or tap @sdutopinion. You’ll still see all of our old tweets. We’ve just changed the name to showcase the more common catch-all term that distinguishes @sdut from @sdutopinion. We hope you join us there, and share ideas and opinions of your own. The conversation will be the same. The journalism will continue to be thoughtful, and insightful, and fun.

Just this week, we asked, “What is the best TV show or movie associated with San Diego?” Last week, we asked, “What is an underrated summer activity in San Diego?” The week before that, we asked, “If you could change one thing about San Diego, what would it be?”

Here’s another question for you: “What’s in a name?

William Shakespeare was right when he answered his own question, saying, “That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet.”

Now, you may think the opinions you read in our section stink, but to us, they’re all part of a respectful, necessary conversation to make San Diego a little better every day. Let us know how you feel. Tag us on social media. Drop me an email. Share your thoughts. This is the new Opinion page. Enjoy.

Adblock test (Why?)



"Opinion" - Google News
July 02, 2021 at 05:44AM
https://ift.tt/3AlTWYT

Opinion: Clearly labeling opinion journalism is essential. We're making sure to do so on social media. - The San Diego Union-Tribune
"Opinion" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2FkSo6m
Shoes Man Tutorial
Pos News Update
Meme Update
Korean Entertainment News
Japan News Update

Why a gag order against Trump would be a good idea - CNN

One must have been sleeping through the Trump presidency not to expect that a wounded Trump will do and say anything to prejudice the fair administration of justice. Now, the district attorney should ask the judge at the arraignment to impose a strict gag order restraining Trump, the Trump family, prosecutors, defense attorneys and all witnesses from making any public statements intended to prevent a fair trial, free of prejudice. A violation of a gag order is the crime of contempt of a court order with a potential one year in jail.
I have personally been involved in a number of high-profile cases where gag orders were imposed, and they are not unusual in high publicity criminal cases. Harvey Weinstein, Michael Jackson, Paul Manafort are just a few of the recent cases in which judges restricted attorneys, defendants and witnesses from speaking publicly.
From the US Supreme Court to state and federal district courts, judges have affirmed their inherent power to control their courtroom by forbidding participants from making public statements whenever they have a "reasonable likelihood of tending to prevent a fair trial, free of prejudice and properly administered." The New York Rules of Professional Conduct for attorneys codifies restrictions on lawyers' out of court statements by prohibiting an attorney from making any statement "ordinarily likely to prejudice materially" a criminal matter -- namely, influencing jurors to affect the outcome of a trial. Without a court-ordered gag order, Trump will likely set out to demonize witnesses, cooperators, prosecutors and the judge in his effort to delegitimize the entire criminal justice system, a bedrock American institution that reflects this nation's principle of impartial justice that is based on evidence and truth.
We don't have to guess what Trump will do and say in his assault on justice. On the eve of the indictment being filed, he gave us a clear sign of his strategy when he released the following statement:
"Radical Left New York City and State Prosecutors, who have let murderers, rapists, drug dealers, and all other forms of crime skyrocket to record levels, and who have just announced that they will be releasing hundreds of people involved in violent crime back onto the streets without retribution of any kind, are rude, nasty, and totally biased in the way they are treating lawyers, representatives, and some of the wonderful long-term employees and people within the Trump Organization."
Trump has proven time and time again that he will set out to destroy anyone who dares oppose him. Just ask California Federal Judge Gonzalo Curiel whose reputation Trump smeared when he falsely accused the judge of being incapable of impartially deciding immigration cases because of his Mexican heritage. Ask Dr. Anthony Fauci, Robert Mueller, General Jim Mattis or General Mark Milley if opposing Trump presents a real danger to their safety and reputation.
Unless he is prevented from commenting on the case and evidence against his company and associates and is restrained from assaulting the integrity of those who oppose him, count this nation's commitment to a fair trial, free of prejudice as Trump's next victim.

Adblock test (Why?)



"Opinion" - Google News
July 01, 2021 at 05:26PM
https://ift.tt/3qCTRf2

Why a gag order against Trump would be a good idea - CNN
"Opinion" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2FkSo6m
Shoes Man Tutorial
Pos News Update
Meme Update
Korean Entertainment News
Japan News Update

Opinion | In Virginia, climate progress and preservation can work together - The Washington Post

Mark P. Coombs lives in Northern Virginia. He was a principal member of the government and public affairs team for the American Battlefield Trust from 2010 to 2021. The views expressed here are his own.

Historic preservation and environmental protection typically go hand-in-hand. “The greenest building,” after all — to cite a phrase coined by architect Carl Elefante — “is one that is already built.”

The complementary relationship of the two movements extends from the built environment to the natural environment. When a battlefield or other natural landscape is preserved for its historic or cultural significance, precious green and open space is protected simultaneously, advancing the goals of preservationists and environmentalists alike.

In Virginia, however, the proliferation of utility-scale solar power plants — also known as “solar farms” — poses one of the greatest challenges to this partnership in the 21st century. Though preservationists warn of the visual and archaeological impacts that these facilities can have on the places that connect us to our past as Virginians and as Americans, proponents of renewable energy welcome the climate-friendly and sustainability-focused impacts that these facilities can have in improving our future as global citizens.

The reality is that both groups are right — and, with United Nations Secretary General António Guterres cautioning recently that the climate crisis is fast approaching a “point of no return,” it is more essential than ever that they come together to align their agendas to meet this moment.

Last year, Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam’s (D) signature on the Virginia Clean Economy Act established the first statewide renewable portfolio standards in the South, requiring Virginia’s electricity to come entirely from carbon-free sources by 2050. The effect of this landmark legislation in combination with earlier measures reducing or removing various financial and regulatory barriers to solar development has been immediately apparent.

“As policy impacts kick in,” read a recent headline from the Energy News Network, “Virginia climbs into top five states for solar.” The article referenced a June 15 report from the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) and Wood Mackenzie that shows that the Old Dominion added more new solar capacity in the first quarter of 2021 alone than it did annually in 2018, 2019 and any year before 2017.

To be sure, ours is far from the only state encouraging and incentivizing solar’s ascent. SEIA underscores that the technology “accounted for 43 percent of all new electricity-generating capacity added in the U.S. in 2020, representing solar’s largest ever share of new generating capacity and ranking first among all technologies for the second year in a row.” But as the state home to more nationally significant battle sites than any other — just one share of a wealth of historic and cultural resources dating back more than 400 years, treasured by residents and visitors alike — Virginia inspires a particular vigilance on the part of the preservation community.

The size of the utility-scale solar power plants increasingly taking root throughout the commonwealth can reach hundreds to thousands of acres apiece. This has soured some preservation advocates on solar altogether, the facilities’ wide footprint stirring opposition not just to a handful of solar projects in historic areas but to pro-solar policies more broadly for fear that the technology will soon render any number of cherished, immovable landscapes unrecognizable.

Rather than opposing solar outright, however — and working against the many longtime allies of preservation in the environmental movement and in elected office who have championed solar’s rise — the better and mutually beneficial way forward is for preservationists to work with the energy industry and government at all levels to aid in the context-sensitive design and siting of solar facilities and related infrastructure. Solar developers and public officials must in turn be willing to receive and reciprocate preservationists’ outreach, hearing and heeding their concerns and counsel.

Through positive and proactive education and engagement, preservationists are uniquely positioned to ensure that a technology that promises to be a powerful tool in the fight against climate change is deployed respectfully and responsibly. The preservation and environmental movements can join forces now as before to help Virginia and its localities properly identify and safeguard key historic, cultural and natural resources while facilitating solar’s continued progression and fostering superior stewardship of our planet writ large.

Time is of the essence.

Together, preservationists and proponents of renewable energy can make Virginia the state to emulate in demonstrating how to forge a brighter future without forsaking a storied past.

Adblock test (Why?)



"Opinion" - Google News
July 01, 2021 at 08:00PM
https://ift.tt/3jzMHqG

Opinion | In Virginia, climate progress and preservation can work together - The Washington Post
"Opinion" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2FkSo6m
Shoes Man Tutorial
Pos News Update
Meme Update
Korean Entertainment News
Japan News Update

Opinion | No one was prepared for the Northwest heat wave — especially not the animals - The Washington Post

Tove Danovich is a freelance journalist based in Portland, Ore.

I knew everyone was in for a rough time when the crows went quiet. It’s baby bird season here in Portland, Ore., and a family of crows and their fledglings have taken up residence in the yard. The babies have fuzzy heads and make flying look like hard work. Their call sounds like they’ve swallowed a kazoo; it usually ends in a strangled garble as their parents stick food down their beaks.

I stopped hearing them Sunday. It was 100 degrees by noon; even before that, the fledglings had their beaks open and their wings out, and were panting rapidly to cool themselves. I didn’t know crows could look so miserable.

The coastal portion of the Pacific Northwest is a temperate rainforest, but it no longer feels like we live in a rainy climate. There were no April showers this year; it was the driest April on record. March and May weren’t much better. This past weekend, we had three days of record-breaking temperatures, peaking on Monday at 116 degrees. The air has been so hot and dry that my throat hurts from breathing. Living through a heat dome is a bit like living inside a snow globe — if someone stuck it in the oven.

No one was prepared for this. Our wildlife, plants and even our infrastructure — asphalt roads have buckled and streetcar cables have melted because of the heat — are made for a damp, mild climate, not for Death Valley.

As temperatures climbed into the upper 90s on Friday, I watched a neighborhood group on Facebook flood with posts from people frantically looking for air conditioners. One man, giving up the search, asked whether anyone with a cool home could take his 150-pound bull mastiff for the weekend. Neighbors posted when hardware stores got shipments of 10 or 50 air conditioners. Each time, the units sold out in hours. People put booties on their dogs to keep the scorching asphalt from burning their paws. Local outdoor pools all closed, because it was too hot for lifeguards to work or for guests to spend much time out of the water.

On Sunday, at 103 degrees, I brought my eight pet chickens inside and put them in the basement bathroom. A few of my hens were panting rapidly, gasping for air. Since then, I’ve heard from a number of people whose chickens died despite their efforts to keep them cool. (My own chickens have taken to their new accommodations well, all things considered. I found three fresh eggs in my shower on Monday.)

Unprecedented is becoming the norm. In less than a year, there’s been a full week where I couldn’t leave my house because of the smoke from nearby wildfires, an ice storm that left thousands of Oregonians without power, and now this heat wave. It’s only June.

One of my neighbors saw a raccoon come to their pond for a sip of water in broad daylight. Sparrows and hummingbirds, normally wary of humans, have hopped or buzzed within a few feet of me to get to a puddle. It seems as though the plants, animals and insects that for so long have thrived here might not be able to survive at all in 20 years. We’re already seeing native plants flowering earlier and old-growth trees dying off. The needles on the native cedars in my yard are parched and drooping.

The Pacific Northwest I remember from childhood is a green and magical place where water squeezes out of moss when you step on it and I could sleep with my windows open all summer long. A hot day meant a trip to the beach, not hiding with the lights off and curtains closed in the basement.

It is easy to conjure ways to make the ever-warming Pacific Northwest more livable for humans. Coastal areas can practice “managed retreats,” so people’s homes no longer lie on flood plains. We can repair asphalt that ruptured in the heat and put new wires on cable cars. More families can put air conditioning in their homes.

But for the plants and creatures that live outside, all we can do is triage.

On the hottest days, I woke up at 6 a.m. to water the browning native plants in my yard. People hustled to put out bird baths and insect waterers and to try to keep them full. One Portlander on Reddit described hosing down a coyote pup that was overheating in the yard. There are no systemic fixes for all the wildlife, trees and plants that have made this region what it is — or what it was.

Read more:

Adblock test (Why?)



"Opinion" - Google News
July 01, 2021 at 03:12AM
https://ift.tt/3x9u8NK

Opinion | No one was prepared for the Northwest heat wave — especially not the animals - The Washington Post
"Opinion" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2FkSo6m
Shoes Man Tutorial
Pos News Update
Meme Update
Korean Entertainment News
Japan News Update

'Luca,' childhood friendship and the discourse around gay fish - The Michigan Daily

Column: Free-speech ruling won't help declining civil discourse - The Salem News

israelob.blogspot.com

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Column: Free-speech ruling won't help declining civil discourse  The Salem News

"discourse" - Google News
July 01, 2021 at 02:45PM
https://ift.tt/3yc4Yyd

Column: Free-speech ruling won't help declining civil discourse - The Salem News
"discourse" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2KZL2bm
https://ift.tt/2z7DUH4

Search

Featured Post

I just paid $9.99 for a carton of 18 eggs. Will prices ever drop? | Opinion - Sacramento Bee

[unable to retrieve full-text content] I just paid $9.99 for a carton of 18 eggs. Will prices ever drop? | Opinion    Sacramento Bee ...

Postingan Populer