Rechercher dans ce blog

Sunday, October 2, 2022

Opinion: A piece of paradise lost - CNN

Editor’s Note: Sign up to get this weekly column as a newsletter. We’re looking back at the strongest, smartest opinion takes of the week from CNN and other outlets.

CNN  — 

“Buy land,” the saying goes, “they’re not making it anymore.”

Variously attributed to Mark Twain and Will Rogers, the advice fits well with the national fixation on real estate, home values and location, location, location. The scarcity of land that can be developed – and surging demand for desirable locations – drove US median home prices over $400,000 for the first time last quarter before interest rate hikes started cooling the market.

In Florida, a warm climate, expansive coastline and low taxes helped fuel a long-term boom, making it the third most populous state. As Hurricane Ian carved an awful path of destruction through the center of the state last week, the damage to people and property was severe. At least 66 people died, homes and businesses were destroyed and for many people, power may be out for weeks.

Florida tightened its building standards after the devastation wrought by Hurricane Andrew in 1992 but even with stronger structures, there’s little chance of avoiding catastrophic damage when 150 mph winds, torrential rain and steep storm surges hit a populated area.

“The simple fact is that when more people are exposed to a natural hazard such as a hurricane,” wrote Stephen Strader, an associate professor of geography and the environment at Villanova University, “the odds for a major disaster to occur are greater. As our population and built environment grows and expands, we are more readily placing ourselves in harm’s way. The wetlands and mangroves that once acted as natural ‘buffers’ to the rising waters and waves that come with hurricanes are now shrinking or gone. They have been replaced by subdivisions.”

Strader traces Florida’s boom back to the early 1910s, when “a man named Carl Fisher (best known as the automobile magnate responsible for building the Indianapolis Motor Speedway) decided to take a vacation on what is now known as Miami Beach.”

“He quickly realized the moneymaking opportunity at hand, buying, clearing and filling in thousands of acres of swamps and mangroves to make way for new waterfront property where investors would line up for the foreseeable future to build homes and hotels for those seeking a piece of paradise,” wrote Strader.

03 opinion column 1001

“There are very few things that test political leaders like natural disasters,” Julian Zelizer pointed out. “When mother nature wreaks havoc, presidents, governors, and legislators are forced to deploy resources to address the dire needs of those affected….”

“At the federal level, President Joe Biden needs to demonstrate he has the leadership and rigorous governing skills that are necessary to help Florida out of this mess,” Zelizer added. “At the state level, Gov. Ron DeSantis, who is billed as a potential Republican presidential nominee for 2024, needs to show that he can achieve more than political stunts like the one he orchestrated earlier this month when he sent migrants from Texas to Martha’s Vineyard.”

As Jack Shafer, writing for Politico, noted, DeSantis sounded a different tone this week, promising to work with the Biden administration to help his battered state recover. “In throttling back on the vitriol, DeSantis proves himself a wiser politician than (former President Donald) Trump, the man who reset politics in 2016 to establish senseless fight-picking and name-calling as part of the normal political arsenal and allowing somebody like DeSantis to rise. Trump, unlike DeSantis, never figured out how to turn off the meshugana theatrics, even when it could have benefited him. Imagine if, for example, Trump had approached the Covid crisis with the reassuring cool of Barack Obama instead of roasting the issue in a bonfire every time he called a presser. He might still be president today.”

Puerto Rico is still recovering from Hurricane Fiona, which was cited as a factor in at least 25 deaths, according to the island’s health department.

“Nearly five years to the day since Maria slammed our island, on September 18 of this year, Hurricane Fiona delivered yet another knockout punch,” wrote Brenda Rivera-García, senior director of Latin America and Caribbean programs for Americares.

“With Maria, we thought we experienced a 100-year flood. But, after only a half-decade later, it seems another century of water has enveloped us: Maria dumped more than three dozen inches of rain in some parts of the island over two days and last week Hurricane Fiona drowned us with 31 inches in a 72-hour period. A week after the storm, nearly 20% of the island was still without potable water, and nearly 60% still had no power, according to Puerto Rico’s government data. Once again, our air is filled with a familiar lullaby — the hum of generators.”

“More and more,” Rivera-Garcia added, “I hear from family, friends, neighbors and people on the street saying, ‘I’m tired. It’s one crisis after another. I can’t take it anymore.’ With multiple generations often living together, family members have always been each other’s rock. But what happens when that rock is shattered?

05 opinion column 1001

Nuclear tensions

06 opinion column 1001

After conducting a series of votes widely viewed as a sham, Russia is moving to annex regions of eastern Ukraine, and President Vladimir Putin is warning that attacks on these territories would be viewed as an assault on Russia itself. He’s raised the fearsome prospect that tactical nuclear weapons could be used to defend what he now claims is part of the homeland.

That poses the huge question of how NATO should react. Hamish De Bretton-Gordon, former commander of the UK & NATO Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) Forces, said that “the West must make it absolutely clear to Putin that any use of nuclear, or chemical or biological weapons is a real redline issue. That said, I don’t think all-out nuclear war is at all likely.”

“NATO must direct that it will take out Russia’s tactical nuclear weapons if they move out of their current locations to a position where they could threaten Ukraine, and must also make clear that any deliberate attacks on nuclear power stations will exact an equal and greater response from NATO.”

This is the time to call Putin’s bluff. He’s hanging on by his fingertips, and we must give him no chances to regain his hold. Russia’s forces are now so degraded that they are no match for NATO and we should now negotiate, with this in mind, from this position of strength.”

Liz Truss’ week

The UK’s new prime minister, Liz Truss, and the Chancellor of the Exchequer Kwasi Kwarteng played starring roles in a week of market turmoil around the globe.

As Frida Ghitis observed, “In the midst of a wave of inflation that is battering the world and prompting central banks to raise interest rates in hopes of cooling inflationary pressures, Truss’ plan to slash taxes, especially for the wealthiest, amounted to opening a firehose filled with gasoline into that raging economic fire.” The pound tumbled, nearly reaching parity with the dollar, and the Bank of England had to announce it would buy bonds to restore confidence.

“Economists and politicians left and right largely agreed that, if not the policy itself, the abrupt rollout and the timing could not have been worse…”

Get our free weekly newsletter

They came at a moment when the world – and the West – stands on a knife’s edge, with Russian President Vladimir Putin annexing large pieces of Ukraine and hinting at using nuclear weapons as his invasion falters. With mysterious explosions causing leaks in the Nordstream pipeline applying further anxiety just ahead of a dreaded winter with gas supply shortages across Europe, all of this is happening when democracy finds itself under pressure the world over.”

The prime minister’s policy is far from the only thing unsettling investors, as central banks around the world aim to tame inflation with rising interest rates, a strategy that risks choking off economic growth.

02 opinion column 1001

Trump bombshell books

Bill Carter has a confession to make: he has not read all the books about Donald Trump.

“I can’t even remember all the books about Donald Trump,” he wrote.

“I know Bob Woodward has written three. So has Michael Wolff. Sean Spicer wrote one (or was it two?). “Mooch” – that is, Anthony Scaramucci, Trump’s White House communications director ever so briefly – wrote one. So did Omarosa, for heaven’s sake.”

“This week marks the release of yet another: New York Times journalist Maggie Haberman’s ‘Confidence Man: The Making of Donald Trump and the Breaking of America.’” Carter cited a New York Times reference to an analysis by NPD BookScan, which found more than 1,200 titles about Trump were released over four years – not including the avalanche of books published since the 2020 election.

“The robust sales for many of these books attest to the hunger among readers to hear every gobsmacking detail about a real-life character who is beyond the imagination of most fever-dreaming fiction writers.”

But even ravenous levels of hunger can be sated – eventually. After seven or eight – or 12 – courses, a bit of bloat is likely to set in … Every book seems to contain a sufficient number of ‘bombshell revelations’ to drum up media coverage, along with some combination of amusing, enraging or revolting personal details (previously unreported, of course, and almost always disputed by the former president)…”

But do they have an impact anymore? A “defining aspect of the collected works on Trump,” Carter concluded, “is that virtually nothing in any of them – none of the ‘bombshells’ or details about his character – seems to have substantially changed people’s minds about him. That may be because Trump acolytes don’t tend to read critical accounts about him – and his opponents aren’t likely to read the hagiographies.”

SE Cupp noted a Vanity Fair report that lifted the curtain on the rivalry between DeSantis and Trump, which included this description of Trump attributed to the governor: “A TV personality and a moron, who has no business running for president.”

“The love loss seems to go both ways. According to reporting by Maggie Haberman, Trump has called DeSantis ‘fat,’ ‘phony,’ and ‘whiny.’”

“As is often the case,” Cupp observed, “the courage to criticize Trump – even among Republicans who might want to run against him – is almost always reserved for private conversations. When will DeSantis get the spine to attack Trump frontally?

Supreme questions

As the Supreme Court begins its new term Monday, the reverberations of its June decision on abortion are still playing out. As Fareed Zakaria wrote, “The Court has been growing more ideologically predictable – that is, politically partisan – in recent years. Judges appointed by Republicans now almost always rule in ways that Republicans want them to. Ditto for judges appointed by Democrats. It is all part of the hyper-polarization of American life.”

“But it is also partly because of the strange way in which America’s highest court is structured,” observed Zakaria, who noted that “no other major democracy gives members of its highest court life tenure.”

The court “has moved in a direction that has weakened its own legitimacy. It might be an occasion to begin a national conversation about what reforms could be put in place to make it less partisan, less divisive and more trusted by the vast majority of citizens. After all, that is the only way its rulings will be truly accepted in a diverse democracy of more than 330 million people.” (Watch Fareed Zakaria’s special report Sunday at 8 p.m. ET and PT: “Supreme Power: Inside the Highest Court in the Land.”)

For more:

Jill Filipovic: This Texas Republican in full sprint is a metaphor for the GOP’s stance on abortion

Steve Vladeck: America’s most powerful court owes the public an explanation

Eric Adams’ challenge

dusa eric adams

One morning in 2016, Eric Adams, a former police officer turned politician – and now New York’s mayor – couldn’t see the numbers on his alarm clock.

“I went to the doctor, who diagnosed me with Type 2 diabetes. He told me I might have my driver’s license revoked due to vision loss, and I might have permanent nerve damage in my fingers and toes.”

After googling “reversing diabetes,” he connected with “Dr. Caldwell Esselstyn at the Cleveland Clinic, who told me I could treat my diabetes with lifestyle changes, including overhauling my diet and exercising.

“I was skeptical at first. But reducing meat and dairy consumption in favor of fresh produce and grains made an immediate difference in my health … Within three months, I lost significant weight, lowered my cholesterol, restored my vision and reversed my diabetes.” But not everyone has the resources to get expert medical advice and turn their health around so dramatically.

“The disproportionate effect of Covid-19 on Black and brown communities was tragically compounded by existing diet-driven health disparities. While higher-income neighborhoods have overwhelming options when it comes to fresh fruits and vegetables, low-income communities of color often live in nutritional deserts with fewer grocery stores and a higher concentration of processed foods, sugary drinks, and shelf-stable products…”

“Now is the time for our country to make the shift from treatment to prevention, from feeding the illness to giving people the tools to build sustainable lifestyles and healthier, stronger communities.”

Don’t miss

04 opinion column 1001

Michael Fanone: What my January 6 assailant deserves

Ruth Ben Ghiat: Casting doubt on Brazil’s election, Bolsonaro follows Trump’s lead

Matthew Bossons: My 5-year-old just confirmed our decision to leave China

Peter Bergen: The British Empire – A legacy of violence?

AND…

Aaron Judge’s record

01 opinion column 1001

To fans of the New York Yankees, there’s an almost mystical connection uniting the team’s pantheon of heroes – including Babe Ruth, Lou Gehrig, Joe DiMaggio, Mickey Mantle, Roger Maris and Derek Jeter. And now by hitting 61 homers in a single season – tying Maris, who bested Ruth’s record of 60 home runs – Aaron Judge has arguably joined those ranks.

As Billy Crystal’s 2001 movie, “61*” made clear, though, those ties have long been frayed – Mantle and DiMaggio had a frosty relationship and there were tensions between Mantle and Maris. But if you widen the lens beyond the Yankees and look at the entire history of Major League Baseball, as Jeff Pearlman wrote, the picture surrounding Judge’s achievement is even more clouded.

“By allowing rampant steroid and human growth hormone usage throughout the 1990s and early 2000s,” Pearlman observed, “Major League Baseball ruined and disgraced its own record book, and Judge’s shot merely (yawn) tied the American League home run mark.”

“When, in 2001, San Francisco’s Barry Bonds broke (Mark) McGwire’s record with 73 homers, we all knew it was nonsense. Not some of us – all of us. Here was a man, at age 36, with muscles growing atop muscles and a skull size that – as I reported in my Bonds biography, “Love Me Hate Me” – had actually increased in recent years (this is physically impossible without the help of HGH). I was in San Francisco the night Bonds passed McGwire, and it was…stupid. Just so damn stupid. The local fans stood and cheered, but it felt flat and meaningless and a bit embarrassing. Like spotting a magician’s fake thumb.”

“All the while, Major League Baseball and the Major League Baseball Players Association did … nothing. Home runs were great business, so team owners shrugged off PED suspicions while the union made clear it would refuse to have its players be tested in any sort of methodical, impactful manner. The result was temporary long ball excitement, followed by the quiet-yet-crushing realization (by most involved in the game) that the record book had been rendered meaningless.” Eventually, baseball woke up and instituted testing for performance enhancing drugs.

As for Aaron Judge, according to Pearlman, “the 30-year-old slugger has had a season for the ages – he’s all but locked up the AL MVP award, and at this moment is in line to become the Yankees’ first triple crown winner since Mickey Mantle in 1956.

“This should be an historic time for baseball.

“This should be an historic time for Aaron Judge.

“Instead, greed destroyed baseball – and took its history with it.”

Adblock test (Why?)



"Opinion" - Google News
October 02, 2022 at 07:19PM
https://ift.tt/CZdPmKh

Opinion: A piece of paradise lost - CNN
"Opinion" - Google News
https://ift.tt/9GMIDlJ
Shoes Man Tutorial
Pos News Update
Meme Update
Korean Entertainment News
Japan News Update

Opinion: Jim Martin: A survey of Boulderites offers fresh insights into our beloved city - Boulder Daily Camera

I am more enlightened about Boulder than ever.

I recently sent emails to a cross-section of Boulderites from a wide range of professions and civic involvements as well as students and retirees, asking what they like and dislike about this gem of a city at the foot of the Flatirons.

Their thoughtful responses showed a broad interest in public affairs, city government, education, Boulder’s current growth and so much more.

Jim Martin for the Camera
Jim Martin for the Camera

It will come as no surprise to learn that at a time of deep political differences, conservatives picked away at liberals, saying they’re tired of their holier-than-thou approach to issues, and liberals picked away at conservatives.

“People can be judgmental, i.e. you are not progressive enough, you are not doing enough to minimize our carbon footprint, your house is too big, you have too many cars, you have too many outside lights on, you make too much money,” one person wrote, playing the role of a progressive criticizing a conservative.

“You are not compassionate, do not care about the environment, and do not have a brain.”

“There are too many progressives who profess to be ‘tolerant’ of everything, yet are totally (disdainful) of conservatives and dismiss their views and anything they believe in.”

I’m not taking sides here. I’m pointing out that multiple conservatives sent similar responses. Liberals behaved a little better, with not as many sending in criticisms of conservatives. But they’ve obviously ticked off the conservatives who may have been lectured one too many times by progressives who, in turn, should consider taking a deep breath before unloading on those to the right.

I learned a lot from this survey and wish to share some of the responses.  

What respondents like about Boulder:

“Jaw-dropping natural beauty — the Flatirons, Chautauqua, hiking trails, year-round beautiful weather (mostly).”

“Engaged people who are committed to keeping Boulder special by honestly addressing our challenges and working to live our values.”

“A great running-yoga-biking-climbing community.”

“Environmental qualities such as open space, recycling and clean energy.”

“Willingness to take stands on state and federal issues.”

“Efrain’s — great Mexican food. Dark Horse Sourdough Burger. Quality education. Walking on campus and attending events. Great public libraries.”

“I love the greenways and trails. I love all the secret places, including a very well-hidden waterfall.”

“The energy, creativity and challenges of CU students and faculty, the proximity to the mountains and the tranquility of Open Space and Mountain Parks, the Farmers Market, and the pedestrian/bike paths and trails as a viable alternative to auto transportation.”

“I like the Blue line that kept development from overtaking the foothills. … I enjoy the diversity of opportunities within the community, athletic, musical, theatrical and cultural.”

“Carnegie Library; world-famous Long (Iris) Gardens.”

“Access to nature trails, ski resorts, lakes.”

“Walks and bike rides around Boulder, especially the Longmont to Boulder Trail. Breakfast at The Parkway. Cheddar-shallot scones at Spruce Confections. The folks in and around San Juan del Centro.”

“Responsive City Council. Acceptance (mostly) of the bicycle community. The (somewhat) successful efforts to preserve the environment, and open spaces.”

“Historic preservation of our most precious buildings. Well-maintained public infrastructure. World-class schools, parks, recreation centers, libraries, museums, public safety and transportation systems.”

“A hot multicultural restaurant scene.”

“A small-town feel. I can’t go anywhere without running into at least one person I know!”

“Having so many accomplished people in the community — scientists, engineers, doctors, writers, artists, business owners. The integrity of local elected officials”

“I love that it’s OK (even a point of local pride) to be sweaty in town. You’re basically announcing, ‘Hey, I just had a great workout.’”

“The city plans to cut emissions 70% by 2030.”

“Colorado Music Festival. The farmers market. The integrity of local officials. Strong nonprofit sector. Amazing scientific community.”

“Quality of education in the Boulder Valley School District.”

 What respondents dislike about Boulder:

“How hypocritical the city is about regulations. They arbitrarily decide what areas and who can have long-term and short-term rentals.”

“The lack of diversity. We are at risk of becoming a mono-culture of older, wealthy white citizens as a consequence of policies that make it difficult for those of modest income to access our community and the need to create a more welcoming environment for all cultures and ethnicities.”

“Overly woke and liberal people.”

“Too many Teslas. Not enough smiling faces in a great small town.”

“The smell of pot. … The Nextdoor website is just awful; it reveals a lot of hard feelings in our community.”

“Google is taking over our city.”

“I wish we could be better with solutions for homelessness, mental health challenges and substance abuse that truly help the people in need.”  

“Bicycle and scooter riders who don’t think traffic laws apply to them. Drivers who don’t use turn signals. Lack of reasonable housing options for young families. Decline of The Hill retail and how dirty and unattractive it is. Self-absorbed liberals who need to spout off on the ‘only way’ to think.”

“The continued density of construction of new buildings that begins to make some areas feel like the canyons of New York City.”

“Housing challenges — especially for our teachers and front-line workers — even our kids can’t afford to live here.”

“I intensely dislike and personally resent the thousands of hours of my time it’s taken to force the city, inch by inch, to implement the online petitioning for ball initiatives that voters put in the City Charter in 2018 by a vote of 71% to 29%.”

“Traffic speeds and congestion, homeless encampments clogging the bike paths and parks, shortage of affordable housing, excessive growth of CU Boulder, unresponsive local elected officials, lack of diversity in the population.”

“Stores refusing to accept cash.”

“Liberal political bias (one-party town with slanted views on too many issues. We often have a ‘monologue’ not a ‘dialogue’ on issues as a result of only one party elected officials. Business-unfriendly attitude (restrictions and excessive sales taxes).”

“I dislike the administration of CU, which still invests tax and tuition money in fossil fuels, hires John Eastman and fires Dr. Detlev Helmig and holds Boulder hostage by refusing to allow flood mitigation.” 

“CU is not a Power-Five football program — it needs to be in a less competitive conference — focus on the basketball program.”

“The media feeding frenzy surrounding the murder of JonBenet Ramsey. The invasion of twits who build mega-mansions. City officials make it maddeningly difficult to do business.”

“We need more transparency from CU about their long-range enrollment numbers”.

“Dense traffic, insufficient infrastructure, poor urban planning.”

“The humorless, sanctimonious tone of so much of our public discourse.”

“I am really disgusted with my own liberal/progressive hypocrisy as well as that of the majority of people like myself.”

“The effort to engage in healthy and civil discussions about issues is sorely lacking, while instead there appears to be an effort to silence, shame and cancel anyone who disagrees with you.”

“The ubiquitous police radar speed traps on Foothills Parkway, with its ridiculously low 45 mph speed limit.”

“Liberal political bias (one-party town with slanted views on too many issues).”

“The site plan and building review process is expensive, time-consuming, arbitrary and capricious.”

“Some of the liberal attitudes just don’t mesh with reality. Housing is an example.”

One respondent couldn’t resist sharing this joke: “A guy from Boulder gets hurt and goes to the ER. The doctor says, ‘Sir, we need to give you a local anesthetic.’ The guy replies, ‘Don’t you have anything imported?’”

The last word goes to this respondent: “I like Boulder because like ourselves, it is forever growing, changing, maturing and trying to be flexible in forever changing times. I like that there are little towns within a city.”

As for me, please don’t shoot the messenger.

Jim Martin has been a Boulder resident for over 61 years and can be reached at jimmartinesq@gmail.com.

Adblock test (Why?)



"Opinion" - Google News
October 02, 2022 at 07:02PM
https://ift.tt/PB3EFNZ

Opinion: Jim Martin: A survey of Boulderites offers fresh insights into our beloved city - Boulder Daily Camera
"Opinion" - Google News
https://ift.tt/9GMIDlJ
Shoes Man Tutorial
Pos News Update
Meme Update
Korean Entertainment News
Japan News Update

Saturday, October 1, 2022

Opinion: The Supreme Court's legitimacy is in danger - CNN

Editor’s Note: This Sunday, Oct. 2, at 8 p.m. ET and PT, CNN will air Fareed’s latest special report, “Supreme Power: Inside the Highest Court in the Land.” This article is adapted from Fareed’s concluding remarks in that special. View more opinion at CNN.

CNN  — 

The power of the first branch of American government, Congress, comes from its ability to tax and spend, a formidable strength. The power of the president, the second branch, crucially includes his or her role as commander in chief of the armed forces. The power of the third branch, by contrast, is technically its symbolic authority.

Fareed Zakaria profile

The Supreme Court cannot enforce any of its own rulings. It relies on the other branches and the public to accept them. That is why the legitimacy of the Court is so important.

And that is why actions that make the Court seem more partisan, more radical, more out of tune with the country, are so dangerous.

The Court’s approval rating, one rough measure of legitimacy, has been declining for decades. And it went down sharply after Bush v. Gore.

That was a nakedly partisan ruling in which conservatives, who had long championed states’ rights, suddenly discovered that the federal government had a crucial role in the 2000 election.

But it was just a highly visible example. The Court has been growing more ideologically predictable – that is, politically partisan – in recent years. Judges appointed by Republicans now almost always rule in ways that Republicans want them to. Ditto for judges appointed by Democrats. It is all part of the hyper-polarization of American life.

But it is also partly because of the strange way in which America’s highest court is structured. It might surprise you to know that no other major democracy gives members of its highest court life tenure.

Most Western countries have fixed terms or mandatory retirement ages: 68 in Germany, 75 in Britain, 75 in Canada. Germany gives its Constitutional Court judges a 12 year term, as do some other democracies.

The American system of selection is also extraordinarily political. In many European countries, by contrast, there are panels of experts that play a large role in sending forward nominees or vetting them. The composition of the committees is often designed to be bipartisan, and involving legal experts. For example, France’s Higher Council of the Judiciary is mostly comprised of elected judges with a few appointed by other bodies. Britain has a somewhat similar selection process. And it is rare to reject the advice of these bodies.

Some European supreme courts are required to rule by consensus rather than majority vote, and they often take pains not to air political divisions.

In Italy, Belgium, and France, for example, the high court justices do not publish dissents in order to maintain the court’s image of impartiality.

The most egregious aspect of the American judicial system is surely the one that is now close to unique: life tenure. It raises the stakes sky high. Judges can wield their power longer than most dictators; some stay on the court for decades. Clarence Thomas, for example, has been on the Supreme Court for almost 31 years, and he is now 74 years old.

The prize is to find young judges, in order to perpetuate their rule for as long as possible. For an aspiring judge, ideological rigidity and lockstep consistency are now the most prized signals to their party that they should get the nod. And a middle-aged, middle of the road, extremely distinguished ideologically moderate judge – in other words, a judge with perfect judicial temperament – doesn’t stand a chance.

And, of course, there is the uncomfortable question of mental deterioration, which is surely something worth considering when judges could be ruling into their 80s and beyond on highly consequential matters involving new technologies, complex economic systems and legal theories.

The Supreme Court of the United States has moved in a direction that has weakened its own legitimacy. It might be an occasion to begin a national conversation about what reforms could be put in place to make it less partisan, less divisive and more trusted by the vast majority of citizens. After all, that is the only way its rulings will be truly accepted in a diverse democracy of more than 330 million people.

Adblock test (Why?)



"Opinion" - Google News
October 01, 2022 at 10:31PM
https://ift.tt/fzKYeXh

Opinion: The Supreme Court's legitimacy is in danger - CNN
"Opinion" - Google News
https://ift.tt/EM40uXn
Shoes Man Tutorial
Pos News Update
Meme Update
Korean Entertainment News
Japan News Update

Opinion: Pass This Climate Bill Too - bushwickdaily.com

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Opinion: Pass This Climate Bill Too  bushwickdaily.com

"Opinion" - Google News
October 02, 2022 at 04:32AM
https://ift.tt/1Va2KvT

Opinion: Pass This Climate Bill Too - bushwickdaily.com
"Opinion" - Google News
https://ift.tt/EM40uXn
Shoes Man Tutorial
Pos News Update
Meme Update
Korean Entertainment News
Japan News Update

TikTok is bad for political discourse and furthers polarization - Johns Hopkins News-Letter

israelob.blogspot.com

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

TikTok is bad for political discourse and furthers polarization  Johns Hopkins News-Letter

"discourse" - Google News
October 01, 2022 at 11:03PM
https://ift.tt/9AiCdng

TikTok is bad for political discourse and furthers polarization - Johns Hopkins News-Letter
"discourse" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2fupMez
https://ift.tt/4Tfad3P

MultiVersus Is Missing One Key Ingredient: Smash Discourse - TheGamer

israelob.blogspot.com

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

MultiVersus Is Missing One Key Ingredient: Smash Discourse  TheGamer

"discourse" - Google News
October 01, 2022 at 11:00PM
https://ift.tt/MhaAczC

MultiVersus Is Missing One Key Ingredient: Smash Discourse - TheGamer
"discourse" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2fupMez
https://ift.tt/4Tfad3P

Friday, September 30, 2022

"Blonde" Author On Film's Divisive Discourse - Dark Horizons

israelob.blogspot.com
Netflix

Author Joyce Carol Oates, who penned the Marilyn Monroe biographical fiction novel “Blonde” upon which this weekend’s Netflix film is based, has weighed in on the discourse surrounding the controversial movie by filmmaker Andrew Dominik.

Having been quiet about the film in the lead-up to its release, Oates answered some questions from fans on Twitter today, including ones about the backlash the film has received, saying it exploits Monroe’s trauma in its “fictionalized retelling” of her life and death.

The film loosely recreates several tragedies during Monroe’s life, from childhood abuse by her mother to sexual assaults within the Hollywood industry.

Though Dominik has said Oates’ work was his guiding light in the project, dubbing it “Joyce’s vision of Marilyn” in interviews, Oates herself was not involved in the movie’s production. She says:

“I think it was/ is a brilliant work of cinematic art obviously not for everyone. Surprising that in a post#MeToo era the stark exposure of sexual predation in Hollywood has been interpreted as ‘exploitation.’ Surely Andrew Dominik meant to tell Norma Jeane’s story sincerely.

[The film is] not for the faint of heart. The director is unflinching, and intransigent. The last 20 minutes or so are almost too powerful to be viewed. Overall, brilliant cinematography & performance by Ana de Armas.

Some see the exposure of sexual mistreatment of Marilyn Monroe as ‘exploitation’ & others [will] see it as a revelation of how a gifted young woman was treated in Hollywood & elsewhere, pre#MeToo.”

The comments come as social media, whilst offering universal acclaim for de Armas herself, is proving very divided on the movie, with labels of it being sexist, detestable, and cruel.

Dominik himself hasn’t helped matters in interviews. In an interview with Sight & Sound Magazine he says he’s more interested in creating a film based on specific images and emotions than he is on reality. Meanwhile, an outtake from the interview shared on Twitter sees Dominik asking if anyone actually watches Marilyn Monroe films anymore.

Source: Twitter

Adblock test (Why?)



"discourse" - Google News
October 01, 2022 at 09:15AM
https://ift.tt/IfCNzQ0

"Blonde" Author On Film's Divisive Discourse - Dark Horizons
"discourse" - Google News
https://ift.tt/BxiZkfI
https://ift.tt/M3AE9uF

Search

Featured Post

I just paid $9.99 for a carton of 18 eggs. Will prices ever drop? | Opinion - Sacramento Bee

[unable to retrieve full-text content] I just paid $9.99 for a carton of 18 eggs. Will prices ever drop? | Opinion    Sacramento Bee ...

Postingan Populer